Accuracy versus Falsification Costs: The optimal Amount of Evidence under different Procedures

Winand Emons & Claude Fluet
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the two parties to the conflict. The parties may misrepresent evidence in their favor at a cost. The arbiter is concerned about accuracy and low procedural costs. When both parties testify, each of them distorts the evidence less than when they testify alone. When the fixed cost of testifying is low, the arbiter hears both,...
This data repository is not currently reporting usage information. For information on how your repository can submit usage information, please see our documentation.