Additional file 10: Table S1. The sequences for all primers and siRNA.

We analysed the forensic characteristics and substructure of the Handan Han population based on 36 Y-STR (short tandem repeat) and Y-SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) markers. The two most dominant haplogroups in Handan Han, O2a2b1a1a1-F8 (17.95%) and O2a2b1a2a1a (21.51%), and their abundant downstream branches, reflected the strong expansion of the precursor of the Hans in Handan. The present results enrich the forensic database and explore the genetic relationships between Handan Han and other neighbouring and/or linguistically...

Additional file 1. Differentially expressed lncRNAs between the EMP and the sham group.

Additional file 2. Differentially expressed mRNAs between the EMP and the sham group.

Additional file 3. The detailed information of the differentially expressed lncRNA-mRNA pairs.

Additional file 7: Table S5. Lookup of all prioritized lipid genes in the Therapeutic Target Database 2022.

Additional file 22: Table S14. Test for difference in effects for index variants from sex-stratified meta-analysis.

Additional file 27: Table S17. Sex-stratified effect sizes in UK Biobank considering all individuals or only those not on cholesterol lowering medications.

Additional file 7: Table S3. The nucleotide sequences of the PgHDZ gene transcripts identified from ginseng cv. Damaya and their subfamilies.

Additional file 2. The genes in the module 1 were extracted and the correlation of clustered genes with modules was calculated.

Additional file 7. Prediction on the target genes of 13 candidate miRNAs (hsa-mir-28, hsa-mir-744, hsa-let-7i, hsa-mir-584, hsa-mir-423, hsa-mir-1249, hsa-mir-1275, hsa-mir-25, hsa-mir-146b, hsa-mir-345, hsa-mir-1237 and hsa-mir-1301.

Additional file 10. RS was calculated based on the LASSO regression coefficient and the expression level of optimal DEMGs.

Additional file 2: Table S1. Summary of each assembly at each step for M. ovinus. Table S2. GenomeScope genome size estimates for M. ovinus with different combinations of k-mer length and maximum k-mer coverage. Table S3. Repeat annotation in M. ovinus. Table S4. Summary statistics for non-coding RNAs in M. ovinus. Table S5. Summary statistics for gene family inference and gene counts for each family and each species. Table S6. Gene family evolution reported from...

Additional file 2: Table S1. Summary of each assembly at each step for M. ovinus. Table S2. GenomeScope genome size estimates for M. ovinus with different combinations of k-mer length and maximum k-mer coverage. Table S3. Repeat annotation in M. ovinus. Table S4. Summary statistics for non-coding RNAs in M. ovinus. Table S5. Summary statistics for gene family inference and gene counts for each family and each species. Table S6. Gene family evolution reported from...

Additional file 2: Table S1. The information of single-gene probes. Table S2. Localization of single-gene probes by FISH on chromosomes of H. bogdanii. Table S3. Localization of single-gene probes by FISH on chromosomes in material DY of E. sibiricus. Table S4. Localization of single probes by FISH on chromosomes in material PJC of E. nutans.

Additional file 12: Table S8. PheWAS UKB-MVP meta-analysis results for each lipid PGS.

Additional file 29: Table S19. Comparison of sex-stratified effect sizes in the UK Biobank for BMI, waist hip ratio adjusted for BMI, alcohol use, and smoking status.

Additional file 3. The expression value of 20 m6A-related genes in NSCLC samples and normal controls.

Additional file 4. The NSCLC samples were classified into subtype 1 and subtype 2.

Additional file 5. The proportions of total 22 types of immune cells were predicted.

Additional file 5. The proportions of total 22 types of immune cells were predicted.

Additional file 5. Supplementary Table 2. The GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of the top 200 co-expression genes of FAM83B.

Additional file 2: Table S1. Classification of DEGs.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2