Additional file 5: Figure S4. The correlation between LARRPM expression, 5hmC level at CSF1 promoter, CpG82 methylation level and CSF1 expression in LUAD tissues. A Correlation between CSF1 and LARRPM expression analysed using the TCGA LUAD data. r = − 0.3069, P < 0.0001 by Spearman correlation analysis. B Correlation between CSF1 and LARRPM expression analysed in our LUAD cohort. r = − 0.5774, P < 0.0001 by Spearman correlation analysis. C 5hmC levels of...

Additional file 4: Fig S3. Cryo-EM analysis. (A) A flow-chart of cryo-EM data processing. (B) Subunit structure in LSSL trimer. (C) Fold diagram for the structure of LSSL. (D) FSC curve (gold standard FSC) as a function of before and after mask application.

Additional file 2. Collection Proof of Strain CM100Z4.

Additional file 4. Collection Proof of Strain SBW10264.

Additional file 2: Supplementary figure 2. The relationship between immune-related function and prognosis of CLL patients.

The annual 10-m maize mapping in China during 2017-2021
The format of data is: [adcode]_[year].tif
the [adcode] is a unique code for province of China. ( More detail: DataV.GeoAtlas地理小工具系列 (aliyun.com) )

Additional file 2: Figure S2. Frequency distribution of phenotypes for 6 panicle architecture traits in 2016H2E273 population derived from a cross between IL-dep7 and DJY1.

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Frequency distribution of phenotypes for 6 panicle architecture traits in 2016H3E3180 population from a cross between IL-ep4.2 and DJY1.

Supplemental material, sj-jpg-1-cat-10.1177_10760296231164355 for Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared With Heparin for Preventing Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Yong Tian, MD, Tao Pan, Xudong Wen, Guangyu Ao, Yihan Ma, Xiaoxiao Liu, Rui Liu, and Hongmei Ran in Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Additional file 4: Figure S4. Distinct injured-proximal tubule clusters in rats with calculi.

Additional file 6: Figure S6. Expression features of distinct markers in BI subclusters.

Additional file 5: Figure S5. Expression features and functional enrichments of proximal tubular subpopulations.

Additional file 7: Figure S7. KEEG enrichments of DEGs in the BI clusters in kidneys of rats with calculi.

Supplementary Material 2

Supplemental material, sj-tif-1-npx-10.1177_1934578X231176916 for Effect and Mechanism of Schizandrin A in the Treatment of Liver Cancer Using Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and Target Validation by Xiaohui Wang, Lin Zhou, Tao Zhang, Hui Chen, Xinhao Song and Feng Wang in Natural Product Communications

Additional file 2: Fig S1B. Level of NT-Pro BNP changes. ARNI, angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor; NT-Pro BNP, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide; SGLT2i, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

Supplementary Figure 2. The PCA, Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis and differentially expressed genes analysis of CRG cluster A and B.

Supplementary Figure 3. The Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis of gene cluster A and B.

Additional file 2: Fig. S1. Rarefaction curves obtained from all samples.

Additional file 3: Fig. S2. The susceptibility of Sphingomonas to different antibiotics. (A) The inhibition zone of different antibiotics against Sphingomonas (a-f): sodium sulfate, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, amoxicillin, and ampicillin. (B) The line chart of different antibiotics to Sphingomonas.

Additional file 3: Fig. S2. The susceptibility of Sphingomonas to different antibiotics. (A) The inhibition zone of different antibiotics against Sphingomonas (a-f): sodium sulfate, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, amoxicillin, and ampicillin. (B) The line chart of different antibiotics to Sphingomonas.

Additional file 4: Fig. S3. Detection of Sphingomonas in nine field populations in 2019. Bars represent the mean ± SE (P < 0.05, Tukey’s test).

Additional file 6: Fig. S5. The stand curve of IMI (A), urea IMI (B) and 5-OH IMI (C).

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Validation of successful mouse POI model construction. (A) and (B) Histopathological examination and follicle counts of ovaries. Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) and (D) Ovary weight (mg) and ovary index (ovary weight / body weight, mg/g). (E) and (F) Levels of serum AMH and E2 concentrations. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01.

Additional file 2: Figure S2. (A) The negative control of IHC-Ksuc and -Cleaved Caspase 3 in mouse ovary administered in vivo sections. Scale bar: 100 μm (B) The negative control of IF-Ksuc (green) and -DAPI (blue) in mouse ovarian sections. Scale bar: 100 μm.