151 Works
Additional file 2 of What is the purpose of clinical trial monitoring?
Sharon B. Love, Victoria Yorke-Edwards, Elizabeth Ward, Rebecca Haydock, Katie Keen, Katie Biggs, Gosala Gopalakrishnan, Lucy Marsh, Lydia O’Sullivan, Lisa Fox, Estelle Payerne, Kerenza Hood & Garry Meakin
Additional file 2. Questions used in UKCRC Task and Finish Monitoring Group annual meeting 9 June 2021.
Additional file 3 of The multimorbidity collaborative medication review and decision making (MyComrade) study: a pilot cluster randomised trial in two healthcare systems
Collette Kirwan, Lisa Hynes, Nigel Hart, Sarah Mulligan, Claire Leathem, Laura McQuillan, Marina Maxwell, Emma Carr, Kevin Roche, Scott Walkin, Caroline McCarthy, Colin Bradley, Molly Byrne, Susan M. Smith, Carmel Hughes, Maura Corry, Patricia M. Kearney, Geraldine McCarthy, Margaret Cupples, Paddy Gillespie, Anna Hobbins, John Newell, Liam Glynn, Davood Roshan, Carol Sinnott … & Andrew W. Murphy
Additional file 3. Communication [11, 12, 30, 48].
Strategies for implementing pet robots in care homes and nursing homes for residents with dementia: protocol for a modified Delphi study
Wei Qi Koh, Dympna Casey, Viktoria Hoel & ELAINE TOOMEY
Background: Pet robots are a type of technology-based innovation that have shown positive psychosocial benefts for people with dementia in residential facilities, such as improving mood and social interaction and reducing agitation. Nevertheless, little is known about how pet robots can be implemented in care homes and nursing homes for dementia care in real-world practice. The objectives of this study are to (1) identify contextualised implementation strategies for implementing pet robots into care homes and...
Additional file 2 of The effectiveness and acceptability of evidence synthesis summary formats for clinical guideline development groups: a mixed-methods systematic review
Melissa K. Sharp, Dayang Anis Binti Awang Baki, Joan Quigley, Barrie Tyner, Declan Devane, Kamal R. Mahtani, Susan M. Smith, Michelle O’Neill, Máirín Ryan & Barbara Clyne
Additional file 2. Search strategy results.
The multimorbidity collaborative medication review and decision making (MyComrade) study: a pilot cluster randomised trial in two healthcare systems
Collette Kirwan, Lisa Hynes, Nigel Hart, Sarah Mulligan, Claire Leathem, Laura McQuillan, Marina Maxwell, Emma Carr, Kevin Roche, Scott Walkin, Caroline McCarthy, Colin Bradley, Molly Byrne, Susan M. Smith, Carmel Hughes, Maura Corry, Patricia M Kearney, Geraldine McCarthy, Margaret Cupples, Paddy Gillespie, Anna Hobbins, John Newell, LIAM GLYNN, Davood Roshan, Carol Sinnott … & Andrew W Murphy
Background: While international guidelines recommend medication reviews as part of the management of multimorbidity, evidence on how to implement reviews in practice in primary care is lacking. The MyComrade (MultimorbiditY Collaborative Medication Review And Decision Making) intervention is an evidence-based, theoretically informed novel intervention which aims to support the conduct of medication reviews for patients with multimorbidity in primary care. Aim: The pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility of a defnitive trial of the...
Stress changes associated with driving pile groups in clayey silt
Bryan A. McCabe & Barry M. LehaneDementia services in Ireland 2018: Audit of community-based health and social care services used by people with dementia
Fiona Keogh, Tom Pierse & Eamon O'SheaEnrichment of blockchain transaction management with semantic triples
Kosala Yapa Bandara, , Subhasis Thakur & John BreslinTrends in health behaviours, health outcomes and contextual factors between 1998-2018: Findings from the Irish Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Study
Aoife Gavin, András Költő, Colette Kelly & Saoirse Nic GabhainnAn insight into bone dielectric properties variation: a foundation for electromagnetic medical devices
Bilal Amin, Muhammad Adnan Elahi, Atif Shahzad, Eoin Parle, Laoise McNamara & Martin O'HalloranNational strategic guide for the implementation of simulation on clinical sites
Dara Byrne, Emily O'Dowd, Sinéad Lydon, Bronwyn Reid McDermot & Paul O'ConnorPolicy priorities for girls' health
Saoirse Nic Gabhainn, Colette Kelly & Aoife GavinPerceived discrimination in minority and matched non-minority adolescents in Ireland
András Költő, Aoife Gavin, Colette Kelly, Michal Molcho & Saoirse Nic GabhainnAdditional file 1 of Development of a co-designed behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals recruiting to clinical trials in maternity care
Vivienne Hanrahan, Louisa Lawrie, Eilidh Duncan, Linda Biesty & Katie Gillies
Additional file 1: Supp. File 1: GUIDED checklist and TIDieR checklist.
Additional file 7 of The effectiveness and acceptability of evidence synthesis summary formats for clinical guideline development groups: a mixed-methods systematic review
Melissa K. Sharp, Dayang Anis Binti Awang Baki, Joan Quigley, Barrie Tyner, Declan Devane, Kamal R. Mahtani, Susan M. Smith, Michelle O’Neill, Máirín Ryan & Barbara Clyne
Additional file 7. Qualitative synthesis recommendations (with at least 3 supporting studies or mixed methods support).
Additional file 5 of Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Nicola Farrar, Daisy Elliott, Catherine Houghton, Marcus Jepson, Nicola Mills, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Lucy Plumb, Julia Wade, Bridget Young, Jenny L. Donovan & Leila Rooshenas
Additional file 5. SoQF. GRADE CERQual Summary of Qualitative Findings.
Additional file 7 of Understanding the perspectives of recruiters is key to improving randomised controlled trial enrolment: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Nicola Farrar, Daisy Elliott, Catherine Houghton, Marcus Jepson, Nicola Mills, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Lucy Plumb, Julia Wade, Bridget Young, Jenny L. Donovan & Leila Rooshenas
Additional file 7. Study Characteristics. Characteristics of each of the studies included in the synthesis.
Additional file 1 of The multimorbidity collaborative medication review and decision making (MyComrade) study: a pilot cluster randomised trial in two healthcare systems
Collette Kirwan, Lisa Hynes, Nigel Hart, Sarah Mulligan, Claire Leathem, Laura McQuillan, Marina Maxwell, Emma Carr, Kevin Roche, Scott Walkin, Caroline McCarthy, Colin Bradley, Molly Byrne, Susan M. Smith, Carmel Hughes, Maura Corry, Patricia M. Kearney, Geraldine McCarthy, Margaret Cupples, Paddy Gillespie, Anna Hobbins, John Newell, Liam Glynn, Davood Roshan, Carol Sinnott … & Andrew W. Murphy
Additional file 1. Recruitment [4, 22, 24, 36, 43, 51, 52].
Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
Claire Beecher, ELAINE TOOMEY, Beccy Maeso, Caroline Whiting, Derek C. Stewart, Andrew Worrall, Jim Elliott, Maureen Smith, Theresa Tierney, Bronagh Blackwood, Teresa Maguire, Melissa Kampman, Benny Ling, Catherine Gill, Patricia Healy, Catherine Houghton, Andrew Booth, Chantelle Garritty, James Thomas, Andrea C Tricco, Nikita N. Burke, Ciara Keenan & Declan Devane
Objectives: A rapid review is a form of evidence synthesis considered a resource-efficient alternative to the conventional systematic review. Despite a dramatic rise in the number of rapid reviews commissioned and conducted in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, published evidence on the optimal methods of planning, doing, and sharing the results of these reviews is lacking. The Priority III study aimed to identify the top 10 unanswered questions on rapid review methodology to...
Priority III: top 10 rapid review methodology research priorities identified using a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
Claire Beecher, ELAINE TOOMEY, Beccy Maeso, Caroline Whiting, Derek C. Stewart, Andrew Worrall, Jim Elliott, Maureen Smith, Theresa Tierney, Bronagh Blackwood, Teresa Maguire, Melissa Kampman, Benny Ling, Catherine Gill, Patricia Healy, Catherine Houghton, Andrew Booth, Chantelle Garritty, James Thomas, Andrea C Tricco, Nikita N. Burke, Ciara Keenan & Declan Devane
Objectives: A rapid review is a form of evidence synthesis considered a resource-efficient alternative to the conventional systematic review. Despite a dramatic rise in the number of rapid reviews commissioned and conducted in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, published evidence on the optimal methods of planning, doing, and sharing the results of these reviews is lacking. The Priority III study aimed to identify the top 10 unanswered questions on rapid review methodology to...